A maker order adds displayed or non-displayed liquidity by resting on an order book. A taker order removes liquidity by executing against a resting order. Some venues charge takers more and give makers a lower fee or rebate, but the schedule depends on the venue, product, volume tier, and participant type.
Trading guide
Maker vs. Taker Fee: Liquidity, Orders, and Execution Costs
trading6 min read
A maker order adds displayed or non-displayed liquidity by resting on an order book. A taker order removes liquidity by executing against a resting order.
6 min read
Practice trading with Finelo
Practice in a simulator, learn with bite-sized lessons, and build confidence before risking real money.
Want to learn more?
Practice in a simulator, learn with bite-sized lessons, and build confidence before risking real money.
Explore FineloExplore Finelo's 28-day challenges
Turn learning into a daily habit with guided challenge paths.
Educational note: This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Finelo does not recommend any security, strategy, platform, or transaction. Investing and trading involve risk, including possible loss of principal. Verify current rules, fees, product terms, and suitability with official sources or a qualified professional.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | Maker execution | Taker execution |
|---|---|---|
| Liquidity effect | Adds a resting order | Executes against a resting order |
| Typical order behavior | Nonmarketable limit order | Market order or marketable limit order |
| Fill timing | Uncertain; may never fill | Usually immediate if sufficient liquidity exists |
| Price control | Limit price controls the worst acceptable price | Market orders prioritize execution, not price |
| Fee treatment | May receive a rebate or lower fee | May incur a higher access fee |
Correct order-book example
Assume the best bid is $99.95 and the best offer is $100.05.
- A limit buy at $99.90 rests below the best bid and adds liquidity if it is displayed on the book. If a later sell order executes against it, the buy is the maker side.
- A market buy executes against resting sell orders, beginning with the best available offer. The buy is the taker side.
- A limit buy at $100.05 can execute immediately against the resting offer, so it may be treated as a taker even though it is a limit order.
Order type alone does not guarantee maker status. The decisive question is whether the order rested or immediately matched existing liquidity under the venue’s rules.
Fees are only one part of execution quality
A maker rebate does not automatically create a better result. A resting order may not fill, the market may move away, or adverse selection may cause the order to fill just before the price moves against it. A taker order can incur a higher explicit fee and slippage, but it may reduce the risk of missing an execution.
Compare the total outcome:
Total execution cost = explicit fees + spread paid or earned + slippage + market impact + opportunity cost
U.S. equity regulatory context
Exchange maker-taker pricing is constrained by Regulation NMS access-fee rules. The SEC amended minimum pricing increments and access-fee caps, but in June 2026 it extended the compliance date for those access-fee-cap provisions to the first business day of November 2027. A venue’s current fee schedule, not an earlier proposal or future cap, controls today’s charge. See the SEC’s June 11, 2026 statement.
Crypto exchanges, options exchanges, and equity venues use different schedules and terminology. Avoid transferring one market’s percentages to another.
Questions to ask before comparing fees
- Which venue and product are involved?
- Does the schedule depend on monthly volume, membership, or order type?
- Will the broker pass exchange fees or rebates to the customer?
- Is the order likely to rest, or is it marketable at entry?
- How do spread, slippage, and fill probability compare with the fee difference?
Practice trading with Finelo
Practice in a simulator, learn with bite-sized lessons, and build confidence before risking real money.
Common mistakes
- Assuming every limit order is a maker order.
- Assuming every maker receives a rebate.
- Comparing fee rates without comparing execution price.
- Ignoring the risk that a passive order does not fill.
- Quoting an exchange schedule without an effective date and product name.
Worked net-cost comparison
Assume a venue charges a taker fee of $0.0030 per share and offers a maker rebate of $0.0020 per share. A 1,000-share marketable order that removes liquidity would have a stated venue cost of $3.00. A 1,000-share limit order that posts and later executes could receive a $2.00 rebate. The apparent difference is $5.00, but that is not yet a complete execution comparison.
Suppose the marketable order fills immediately at $25.00, while the posted order waits and fills at $25.02 after the market moves. The additional two cents per share equals $20, which is larger than the fee advantage. In a different scenario the posted order could fill at a better price, making the maker route preferable. The result depends on fill price, fill probability, delay, partial executions, adverse selection, and opportunity cost—not only the fee label.
Use a consistent benchmark when reviewing executions. The midpoint or arrival price at the moment the order was released can help separate price movement from explicit fees. Record commissions, venue fees or rebates, regulatory charges, spread paid or captured, and unfilled quantity. A broker may route orders across venues under its own policies, so the customer may not receive the exchange's raw maker rebate directly.
For crypto or other non-equity venues, confirm how the platform defines maker and taker status, its volume tiers, rounding, and whether fees are charged in the traded asset or quote currency. Those schedules are venue-specific and should not be inferred from U.S. equity rules. Recheck the live fee page before calculating an expected cost.
Comparing fee tiers without overestimating savings
Volume tiers are often based on a rolling monthly total, account classification, or share of venue activity. Use the tier actually earned, not the rate advertised for the highest-volume customers. Include any membership, platform, data, or withdrawal cost required to reach that tier. A lower marginal fee can be offset by fixed charges or by routing more activity than the strategy would otherwise justify.
Recalculate the comparison when order size, spread, or volatility changes. The maker route may have a fee advantage in stable conditions but a larger non-fill or adverse-selection cost during fast markets. Report both explicit cost and implementation shortfall so the fee schedule does not become a proxy for overall execution quality.
Frequently asked questions
Do makers always pay less?
No. Some venues use inverted or otherwise different pricing, and participant tiers can change the result.
Can a market order be a maker?
Normally no, because a market order is designed to execute immediately against resting liquidity.
Can a limit order be a taker?
Yes. A marketable limit order that immediately matches a resting order removes liquidity.
Does a maker rebate guarantee a lower net cost?
No. Spread, slippage, adverse selection, market impact, and missed fills can outweigh the rebate.
Sources and Further Verification
TradingMaker vs. Taker FeeBeginner
Practice trading with Finelo
Practice in a simulator, learn with bite-sized lessons, and build confidence before risking real money.
About the author
Finelo Team
The Finelo Team creates practical investing and trading education designed to help beginners learn faster with structured challenges, simulator practice, and bite-sized lessons.
Keep reading — Related articles
Trading
What Is SPAN Margin: Learn the Concept & Risk Controls
SPAN margin is an exchange-level, risk-based margin framework that calculates required collateral for futures and options by assessing portfolio risk across prescribed market scenarios rather than using a flat per‑contract rate.
Finelo Team
Trading
What Is Portfolio Margin: Learn the Concept & Risk Controls
Portfolio margin is a risk-based method that applies scenario analysis to eligible positions in an approved margin account.
Finelo Team
Trading
What Is NQ in Trading: Learn the Concept & Risk Controls
In trading, NQ is the ticker symbol for the E-mini Nasdaq-100 futures contract, listed on CME Group's exchange.
Finelo Team